When subtext =/= buttsex.
Sunday, February 6th, 2011 10:36 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Lots of sensible things about LGBTQ representation are being said over at
sparkindarkness' journal on how problematic subtextual and Word of Gay type of "representation" in canon are.
There are also smart things in the comments on how problematic platonic and asexual relationships are being made if every platonic on-screen relationship is automatically seen as sexual by
kazaera here.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
[...]
No, it’s not enough. Your hot men who have what may be a lingering look or touched each other a little longer than you thought was strictly necessary or y’know are just “so gay together” do NOT count as GBLTQ representation. I don’t care if you’re sat there with your slash goggles and you’re going to run on home and dash off a ream of steamy steamy mansexing (but hey, if you’re going to, maybe you can avoid tropes like making one of the men shorter than he is on screen so he can ‘bottom properly’ and other such badness? Ugh, yes really) your slash fantasy is not a GBLTQ representation.
[...]
No, it’s not enough. Your hot men who have what may be a lingering look or touched each other a little longer than you thought was strictly necessary or y’know are just “so gay together” do NOT count as GBLTQ representation. I don’t care if you’re sat there with your slash goggles and you’re going to run on home and dash off a ream of steamy steamy mansexing (but hey, if you’re going to, maybe you can avoid tropes like making one of the men shorter than he is on screen so he can ‘bottom properly’ and other such badness? Ugh, yes really) your slash fantasy is not a GBLTQ representation.
[...]
There are also smart things in the comments on how problematic platonic and asexual relationships are being made if every platonic on-screen relationship is automatically seen as sexual by
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: Saturday, February 12th, 2011 12:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Saturday, February 12th, 2011 12:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Saturday, February 12th, 2011 12:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Saturday, February 12th, 2011 12:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Saturday, February 12th, 2011 12:46 am (UTC)That is the feeling I get from a lot of "Christian" articles and posts, so yes, I understand your frustration.
how incredibly cushioned she must have been by straightness that she never had to think about these things before
I think I also get a bit riled up because I feel addressed when you write things like this.
Communication is of the devil :/ It's sometimes like even good friends like us are from different planets. Also, I suspect if we could talk in IM or even better in person, some of the issues wouldn't come up.
no subject
Date: Saturday, February 12th, 2011 11:09 am (UTC)I think I also get a bit riled up because I feel addressed when you write things like this.
But why? That, I don't get. Are you straight? And even if you are straight, privilege and internalised homophobia exist, and they do inform people's views on life (as, as you know, they did mine and pretty much that of all gay women I know who believed they were straight at some point), they do cushion and limit experiences, as they did the author's of this article, and I get to moan about that in my journal because they marginalise me and tell me that the way I am is in some way wrong.
Communication is of the devil :/ It's sometimes like even good friends like us are from different planets. Also, I suspect if we could talk in IM or even better in person, some of the issues wouldn't come up.
Very likely, yes.
no subject
Date: Saturday, February 12th, 2011 12:56 pm (UTC)Think it's maybe just because I'm so easily read as straight - I had 3,5 years of being in a straight relationship AND I have the kid. Especially the kid.
no subject
Date: Saturday, February 12th, 2011 01:04 pm (UTC)Ok, for the record - I don't think you're straight. I doubt I ever did, seeing as how you told me in our first conversation that you crushed on your best friend at school. ;)
no subject
Date: Saturday, February 12th, 2011 01:34 pm (UTC)