Good things

Friday, December 17th, 2010 10:05 pm
mothwing: Image of a death head hawk moth (Default)
  • The endless amounts of white, fluffy snow! now that I get to enjoy it from inside)! Reading "A Child's Christmas in Wales" aloud three times must have worked some kind of charm.
  • Going to Ikea with N. and coming home with stuff we don't really need. Like this mirror and these covers. I'm thinking about this lamp, too, but I don't like the way you can see the lighbulb and I think I'm going to get a candle instead. Or this one, which is also pretty.
  • Föhn mich nicht zulooks like fun - pretty much all of this year's trainees have purchased this book which is apparently a humerous memoir of a bad trainee's exploits.
  • Looking forward to baking cookies tomorrow
  • The Horrible Histories series which can be found on YouTube. Have some Charles II:
  •  
  • This aritcle
    «The cultural genome: Google Books reveals traces of fame, censorship and changing languages»
    Abstract: We constructed a corpus of digitized texts containing about 4% of all books ever printed. Analysis of this corpus enables us to investigate cultural trends quantitatively. We survey the vast terrain of "culturomics", focusing on linguistic and cultural phenomena that were reflected in the English language between 1800 and 2000. We show how this approach can provide insights about fields as diverse as lexicography, the evolution of grammar, collective memory, the adoption of technology, the pursuit of fame, censorship, and historical epidemiology. "Culturomics" extends the boundaries of rigorous quantitative inquiry to a wide array of new phenomena spanning the social sciences and the humanities.  Entertaining summary here.
     
    Summary with brief overview here.
mothwing: "I can't be having with this" next to the grim looking face of Granny Weatherwax (Granny)
As a hobby linguist I've been curious about Goddard's and Wierzbicka's natural semantic metalanguage/semantic primes as an L2 teaching and learning tool for a while, and I've been trying to apply it to various concepts I've encountered so far with varying success.

The notion of cultural scripts I find particularly interesting, and I've been trying to apply those to some cultural scripts of our own.

Here's some example of cultural scripts:  )

Here's a table of semantic primes (Goddard, 2002): 


So what does that give us for "slut shaming"?

I got something like this: 

[people think like this:]
I want to say you are a bad person. Because of this I say you do things with your body and many other people's bodies.
It is good to do things with your and one other person's body, but not many people's - that makes you a bad person.
I want people to know that I know this is bad.
You are a person to whom I can say, "You are a bad person", and you cannot do bad things to me because of this.
People will think it is true if I say to you,
"You are a bad person, and you are doing bad things with your body"
I want you to think that you are a bad person.
 
 
...which leaves out the gendered double-standard, and its still pretty choppy. I wish we'd have had courses on this at uni, though they probably wouldn't have done me any good, given that I'm not a linguist.

Anyone have any ideas?
mothwing: A wanderer standing on a cliff, looking over a distant city (Book)
I have to admit, this abstract really leaves me wanting more and raises some questions, especially about what the point of this is, really. It may be my headache, but I really feel as though I'm not getting something here.

Sexuality scholars have noted the historical connection between appearance and gay or lesbian identity. However, as the social landscape for lesbian women and gay men has shifted over the past forty years, little research has documented how such changes influence gay and lesbian individuals' appearance choices as they form, manage, and maintain their identities. To explore the impact of this "post-closet" (Seidman 2002) era on the identities and appearances of lesbians and gays, in-depth interviews were conducted with twenty individuals, aged eighteen to thirty. Findings suggest that while most people use appearance to attain a sense of authenticity after "coming out," achieving a feeling of authenticity in gay and lesbian spaces presents unique challenges as individuals come under scrutiny by the community.
David J. Hutson‌.

1. Post-closet era. Post. Closet. Era.
2. How, pray tell, do you "use appearance to attain a sense of authenticity"...? I mean, I'm guessing here that they're aiming at the struggles that femme women face to "look gay enough" in the eyes of some people and the backlash that butch women get for "embodying a negative and harmful stereotype", but I'm still left with the feeling that I need to find myself a pansexual outfit ASAP. Maybe some bisexual pants? Does that mean that Crocky has to cut her hair? I just... yeah.

Also, I am not sure why they went for a qualitative study here, and I'd really appreciate if someone enlightened me. And also, the point of this. So twenty people say that they use their appearance to signify their identity ~authentically~. And now?
mothwing: (Woman)
Google Reader threw a wobbly the other day and flooded my feed with posts from the past, which allowed me to catch up with stuff I hadn't seen back in the day. I missed this post at Genderbitch's: "For the Uninformed: Privilege, Perspective and The Little Things That Jab" - and I assume that a lot of you have already seen this, but if you haven't, do go and read it, it's great (as well as the post it replies to, "The Terrible Bargain We Have Regretfully Struck" over at Shakesville). 

I'm especially grateful for this part:
For the Uninformed: Privilege, Perspective and The Little Things That Jab
[...]

I am mtf trans (obviously from the blog title XD). I was born male bodied and I transitioned to female bodied. Unlike a lot of trans folk (who viewed things through the lens of their identities as a different gender and therefore wouldn’t have had problems with how they were treated for the same reasons as others would) my identity hasn’t really played a huge role in the lens I apply my own experiences. This was mostly because I came to the realization about why I hated the male structure I had very late in the game (I actually assumed it was normal to hate having a penis XD) So I consider myself formerly a guy who figured out that he needed a female body (due to dysphoria) and therefore was better off as a girl (identity and sociologically wise) for practicality sake. This is atypical, so don’t expect all trans folk to have the perspective I do on gender.

Which means I experienced male privilege as male privilege (instead of being transformed into transphobia by the lens of identity) and I experienced the loss of male privilege (as I myself transformed from hormones and whatnot.)

It was a shock, I will tell you. As a person perceived as a guy by society, I was not constantly challenged, stereotyped, joked about and pushed down. There were some small things. Depictions of guys in tv were sometimes irritating. Occasionally there were jokes about the dumb guy stereotype. And there were constraints on self expression for guys that were a bit irritating. But even if I violated those rules, I usually could tell opposition to piss off or criticize my criticizers right back and everyone thought that was an utterly natural thing for me to fight the silly claims from people, even if they didn’t agree.

Post sociological and HRT transition. What was an occasional flow of jokes, jabs and attacks became a torrent. I was bombarded. Television was filled with all sorts of stereotypes, attacks, mockeries of women. Pressure to conform was harsher and more persistent (instead of just guys calling me a fag for having long hair and wearing toe socks it was now everyone calling me a weird dyke or telling me that I need to femme out more for wearing guys cargos and t-shirts with a faux military jacket). And my attempts to dispute that pressure, my responses at all really (even the nice ones) were now regarded as me being a bitch, a harpy, a “feminazi” or being unreasonable. Whereas before, people disagreed and discussed with me, now, they simply dismiss it completely.

I was shown, completely (and perhaps embarrassingly) how little perspective I had on what society does to women. And that is why I understand how insidious privilege is. It is silent, it is crafty, it sneaks up on you, latches on and makes it impossible to even question it without seeming nuts. And there’s the problem. We aren’t nuts.

This shit is real.
- Genderbitch.
mothwing: A wanderer standing on a cliff, looking over a distant city (Book)
JK Rowling on single mothers, poverty and politics in the UK.

from: «The Single Mother's Manifesto»
Yesterday’s Conservative manifesto makes it clear that the Tories aim for less governmental support for the needy, and more input from the “third sector”: charity. It also reiterates the flagship policy so proudly defended by David Cameron last weekend, that of “sticking up for marriage”. To this end, they promise a half-a-billion pound tax break for lower-income married couples, working out at £150 per annum.

I accept that my friends and I might be atypical. Maybe you know people who would legally bind themselves to another human being, for life, for an extra £150 a year? Perhaps you were contemplating leaving a loveless or abusive marriage, but underwent a change of heart on hearing about a possible £150 tax break? Anything is possible; but somehow, I doubt it. Even Mr Cameron seems to admit that he is offering nothing more than a token gesture when he tells us “it’s not the money, it’s the message”.

Nobody who has ever experienced the reality of poverty could say “it’s not the money, it’s the message”. When your flat has been broken into, and you cannot afford a locksmith, it is the money. When you are two pence short of a tin of baked beans, and your child is hungry, it is the money. When you find yourself contemplating shoplifting to get nappies, it is the money. If Mr Cameron’s only practical advice to women living in poverty, the sole carers of their children, is “get married, and we’ll give you £150”, he reveals himself to be completely ignorant of their true situation.

How many prospective husbands did I ever meet, when I was the single mother of a baby, unable to work, stuck inside my flat, night after night, with barely enough money for life’s necessities? Should I have proposed to the youth who broke in through my kitchen window at 3am? Half a billion pounds, to send a message — would it not be more cost-effective, more personal, to send all the lower-income married people flowers?
JK Rowling.
mothwing: "I can't be having with this" next to the grim looking face of Granny Weatherwax (Granny)
Not a big surprise, really, though the study (German) is ten years old, and I don't know anything about the methodology or details on the sample they used for this study, as they don't go into detail in the article this table was included in.


(Translation mine)
mothwing: (Woman)
Although many studies have been conducted on homophobia, little information exists about the attitudes of homosexuals toward heterosexuals. In order to compare the attitudes of both groups, a well-known homophobia questionnaire (Hudson & Ricketts, 1980) was reworded to assess the attitudes of homosexuals toward heterosexuals, forming a “heterophobia” questionnaire.
The less clinical term “heteronegativism” is introduced here to refer to the range of negative feelings that gay individuals could possess regarding heterosexuals. Sixty homosexual students were matched with 60 heterosexual psychology students on sex, age, race, and education. Each group was given its respective “phobia” questionnaire.
Hypotheses that homosexual participants would report less phobia and more negative experience than heterosexuals and that gay women would report more phobia than gay men were supported. Hypotheses that level of abuse in closeted homosexuals would be positively correlated with phobia scores and that being “out of the closet” would be negatively correlated with phobia scores were not supported.
Stephen M. White, Louis R. Franzini, '99

Haiti in the news

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010 01:04 pm
mothwing: "I can't be having with this" next to the grim looking face of Granny Weatherwax (Granny)
This has been so predictable. Crying children. Miracles of saved children. Crying women. Women stuck in the rubble, making me wonder what complete asshole of a photographer prioritised taking a picture over helping. White people in uniforms helping. And dogs helping, too.

The stories in pictures as seen by me in onine versions of papers and magazines has a pretty predictable pattern common to all disasters - victims are always female, people showing emotions are usually women, looters are usually male, people helping are usually white. Still, this earthquake killed about two hundred thousand people, and some of them are bound not to have been young, attractive women. And even those nameless, storyless women who are crying and being saved and being tended to by white saviours now are bound to get up and go out and search for their families, find their children, bury their dead. They may dig through rubble in the hope of finding someone still alive even today, and help organise the people come to help, because they are bound to know her home better than the foreign white saviours. And then they will help rebuild homes, and then go back to their lives as farmers or doctors or servants or teachers.

In many newspapers, it seems as though the Haitians don't do anything apart from lying half-naked and dead in mass graves, stumbling around in a daze, shooting each other and going looting, while white people are helping and Keeping Order. The earthquake was a horrific tragedy, and its sickening that this kind of reporting apparently helps to get people to donate.
mothwing: A wanderer standing on a cliff, looking over a distant city (Book)
I found this article today and it looks interesting. I 'm storing it on here because the uni PCs won't let me get onto my e-mail provider's web page for some odd reason.

Abstract: 

Friends are of crucial importance to lesbians’ lives, their significance heightened due to lack of acceptance from blood family, work colleagues and society. Despite a proliferation of literature on lesbians’ love relationships, lesbians’ friendships remain understudied. In the light of theorising about widespread shifts in intimacy patterns in modern industrial societies, this thesis examines the role of friendship for contemporary lesbians. It takes an interdisciplinary approach, using lesbian feminist, feminist psychological and mainstream sociological theories to interpret lesbians’ negotiations of their friendships and preoccupations with their own continually developing sense of self.

The study finds that firstly, the most significant issue in negotiating friendships is deciding on a lesbian identity despite socialisation to ‘compulsory heterosexuality’. Friends are expected to be accepting and supportive or they are lost. Discrimination, the fact that the lover is the ‘best friend’, struggles with difference in lesbian communities, time constraints and a more general shift to individualism mean that community and family contacts are replaced by small, supportive and affirming friendship networks. These meet needs and within them lesbians negotiate a sense of self, but for the most part with no template of political consciousness. Secondly, while friendships are important, they are also difficult. The fluidity of the friendship relationship, blurred boundaries between friends and lovers, and women’s moral ‘imperative to care’ all provide barriers to communication. Thirdly, while lesbians value ‘the relational self’, a confident sense of self is challenged when close-connected relationships sit at odds both with mainstream, heterocentric culture, and with traditional models of psychology which promote independence and separateness.

Lesbians who are confident communicators, who have access to alternative feminist discourses which value relatedness, and who, together with their friends, are open to change, are able to negotiate satisfactory friendships and relationships. The study demonstrates lesbians’ complex subjectivities as changing selves are negotiated through friendships, love relationships and communities, particularly through experiences of loss.
mothwing: "I can't be having with this" next to the grim looking face of Granny Weatherwax (Granny)

I found another reason today to hate Psychology Today. We all know that we're not suppose to dress like those filthy, filthy sluts, right? No short skirts and no make-up and nothing that invites the poor driven rapists to rape us, because of course those poor people can't control themselves, right?

So, don't wear something too riling, otherwise you might have been, "asking for it". And don't walk too confidently, because you might be riling them, anyway:

 

For this reason, robbers are especially apt to target people who are flaunting material possessions or even just displaying a cocky, superior attitude. Street predators have their own word for such behavior—"flossing"—and it infuriates them. "It's a very visible reminder of their situation," Wright adds, "of being poor, that they've got nothing in their pockets."

Psychology Today would also like to inform you that if you dress too modestly, you are as, if not more likely to be attacked because high necklines and full-body cover as well as bowed down walk = submissive personality and a flirty invitation for sex.

"The same team also found that rapists tend to be more able than average to interpret facial cues, such as a downward gaze or a fearful expression. It's possible this skill makes rapists especially able to spot passive, submissive women. One study even showed that rapists are more empathetic toward women than other criminals—although they have a distinct empathy gap when it comes to their own victims. A highly attuned rapist and a woman who's oblivious to hostile body language make a dangerous combination.

Even personality plays a role. Conventional wisdom holds that women who dress provocatively draw attention and put themselves at risk of sexual assault. But studies show that it is women with passive, submissive personalities who are most likely to be raped—and that they tend to wear body-concealing clothing, such as high necklines, long pants and sleeves, and multiple layers. Predatory men can accurately identify submissive women just by their style of dress and other aspects of appearance. The hallmarks of submissive body language, such as downward gaze and slumped posture, may even be misinterpreted by rapists as flirtation."


So you can totally prevent being raped or robbed by wearing confidently, but not flaunting what you have, not wearing provocative clothes, but not too modest ones, not engage in conversation with men and walking away, but not in a submissive way because that might just be too flirty, and everyone knows that flirty women were asking for it. Because being a rape victim can totally be prevented and is all about the personality of the victim rather than that of the rapist.

I know that walking around while on the phone in back alleys is about as bright as entering the Shades before the times of the Thieves' Guild, but the attitude of this article seems to be that those who do the right things will never be raped or mugged, and that is just bullshit.
 

They offer some tips on risk reduction. )
So, be a good girl and stay at home, and always make a point on dressing the right way!
mothwing: "I can't be having with this" next to the grim looking face of Granny Weatherwax (Granny)
Someone in [livejournal.com profile] environment  posted a rather alarming article about the effects of plastic on the oceans -  and there was a statistic on recycling in the US that caught my eye: 



Three to five percent? That's not a lot.

As far as I know, this is different in the EU. Not only are 80% of all wastes recovered in most member states, 40% of plastics are recycled and rising. Many of the well-off member states don't use landfills at all any more, our newest member states still do, and there is of course the problem of waste being shipped off to China for recycling or to other countries to be put in landfills, anyway.
Still, on the whole, I was shocked to find that things are SO much worse in the US. Although maybe, considering what even EU recycling can look like, I maybe didn't have reason to think too highly of it.
mothwing: A wanderer standing on a cliff, looking over a distant city (Book)
The part of your brain which is responsible for your sarcasm detection is probably the left Brodmann's area 47.
"[S]arcasm detection activated the neural circuits involved in mentalizing processes, as well as those of the semantic executive system. This is consistent with the notion that pragmatic processes, such as sarcasm, are closely related to mentalizing functions (Frith and Frith, 2003). We suggest that the left BA 47 might be where mentalizing and language processes interact during sarcasm detection."

"Sarcasm detection activated the left temporal pole, the superior temporal sulcus, the medial prefrontal cortex, and the inferior frontal gyrus (Brodmann's area [BA] 47). The left BA 47 was activated more prominently by sarcasm detection than by the first sentence. These findings indicate that the detection of sarcasm recruits the medial prefrontal cortex, which is part of the mentalizing system, as well as the neural substrates involved in reading sentences."

Ok. Back to topic. Ahem.
mothwing: (Woman)
Look, Crocky - a study:

Moving Down: Women’s Part-time Work and Occupational Change in Britain 1991–2001, by Sara Connolly, Mary Gregory.

They found that women who change to a part time job - those being mostly mothers during childcare years - from their full-time job usually end up with a job far below their level of skill and of training. That does not happen because mothers want easier  jobs to be able to concentrate on their children, but because so little part-time opportunities exist in interdemediate and upper levels and they are thus forced out of those jobs. So most women in part-time jobs are wasting their training and knowledge on low-status, low-reward, low-skill jobs, which is snappily called a "hidden brain-drain".


Rather alarming, especially considering how unlikely it is that there will be greater flexibility any time soon - apart from in the social sector. 

No gay hearts?

Sunday, January 13th, 2008 01:08 pm
mothwing: (Woman)
"OTTAWA (Reuters) - Canada has imposed sweeping restrictions on who can donate organs for transplant -- including a ban on gay men who have been sexually active in the past five years. [...] The restrictions, which also cover drug addicts, prisoners, prostitutes and people who have had tattoos or body piercings in the last 12 months using shared needles, came into effect last month.
"A gay man who had practiced abstinence for the five years prior (to making an organ donation) would be acceptable," said the spokeswoman. "Likewise a heterosexual man who had had a single sexual encounter with a male within the last five years would not be considered acceptable even though he is not gay."

Well, let's hope that the situation in Canada has improved so much from 2004 that they don't need additional donors.
Here's an online petition. 
mothwing: Gif of wolf running towards the right in front of large moon (Wolf)
For those who don't know - be very careful with things that contain it if you don't want to gain a lot of weight.

There is a heated debate about how dangerous it really is, with scientists claiming it's a perfectly natural taste enhancer on the one and and scientists claiming its neural toxicity for both adults and babies on the other, but even if GLU can't cross the blood-brain barrier its unhealthy enough.

There are some foodstuffs which contain it naturally (meat, ageing cheese), but its fairly common in other, non-sweet foodstuffs as well, like soups, crisps, chips, rahmen - just check the stuff in your kitchen. It's in there for the sole purpose of enhancing the taste, but also to make people consume more of the stuff.  There is a study from 2005 that deals with GLU, and the outcome of that is fairly alarming:

Obesity, voracity, and short stature: the impact of glutamate on the regulation of appetite (M Hermanussen and JAF Tresguerre)

From the article:"... The animals fed 5 g MSG per day increased water uptake by threefold (P<0.01), and food uptake by almost two-fold (P<0.01). The influence of MSG is in general more marked in males than in females."

Interpretation: GLU is a widely used nutritional substance that potentially exhibits significant neuronal toxicity. Voracity, and impaired GH secretion are the two major characteristics of parenterally administered GLU-induced neuronal damage. GLU maintains its toxicity in animals even when administered orally. Males appear to be more sensitive than females. The present study for the first time demonstrates, that a widely used nutritional monosubstance – the flavouring agent MSG – at concentrations that only slightly surpass those found in everyday human food, exhibits significant potential for damaging the hypothalamic regulation of appetite, and thereby determines the propensity of world-wide obesity. We suggest to reconsider the recommended daily allowances of amino acids and nutritional protein, and to abstain from the popular protein-rich diets, and particularly from adding the flavouring agents MSG.


Skipping Methods and Material.

Results )

More here.

Ok, European Court, toxic or not, why is it allowed to add this stuff to food at all?

mothwing: Gif of wolf running towards the right in front of large moon (Wolf)
Bush actually vetoed the troop withdrawal?

I can't believe he did that. He should listen to himself more often: "Our troops and their families deserve better, and their elected leaders can do better."

Right he is. He could have done much better.

Mary Celeste

Friday, April 20th, 2007 11:30 am
mothwing: A wanderer standing on a cliff, looking over a distant city (Book)
I didn't think things like these would ever happen in real life. Huh.

Ok, off to give a talk to people about my internship who are not interested.

Seriously, weekend seminars are the most stupid thing ever invented. We'll be meeting today, from 14:00-19:00, and then again tomorrow, from 9:30 - 18:00. I have to say, I am interested in how the internships of the others went, but I don' t need big, long TALKS on that, we could just talk about that over a coffee. I really don't need a two-day seminar on that. *sigh*

Especially since all of us basically do the same thing. We introduce the school, then we show a clip from our classes, then we discuss the clip and what went wrong/what worked well, then we look at the next clip - it's horrid. And that's what's going to be happening for two days straight, too. I don't know how I am going to survive Saturday at all.

But this way, it is supposed to be much more scientific, and we can all tell each other how horrid we've been and what we've done wrong. Which we are able to see, anyway, because we're all able to say what's wrong about something when looking at it ON TAPE, thanks very much. Complete waste of time.   
mothwing: Gif of wolf running towards the right in front of large moon (Wolf)
Oh, this is just great. Five years, and then they'll probably be extinct due to deforestation thanks to the palm oil industry, of all things!

"Palm oil is seen by critics as a cautionary tale about good intentions. As a vegetable oil it can enhance a healthy diet, and as a biofuel it can reduce carbon emissions which contribute to climate change. Yet it transpires that humans' pursuit of an ethical lifestyle could inadvertently mean a death sentence for one of the great apes.

The paradox was brought to world attention by Friends of the Earth, whose ongoing campaign for producers, manufacturers and retailers to commit to sustainable palm oil was recognised at last week's Observer Food Monthly awards with the honour for best ethical contribution to the industry.

The UN's environment programme report, 'The Last Stand of the Orang Utan: State of Emergency', says natural rainforests of Indonesia and Malaysia are being cleared so rapidly that up to 98 per cent may be destroyed by 2022, and the lowland forest strongholds of orang utans much sooner, unless urgent action is taken. This is a full decade earlier than the previous report estimated when it was published five years ago. Overall the loss of orang utan habitat is happening 30 per cent more rapidly than had previously been thought."

Awesome.

Finally...

Friday, March 23rd, 2007 12:01 am
mothwing: Image of a death head hawk moth (Default)


Yay! Sense!

Well, sense in installments.

Seems as though our dearest Länder have finally been able to agree on most (!) parts of a country-wide smoking ban in public places such as bars, discos, schools, kindergartens (?! WTF? That was ALLOWED??), etc. No word on universities, though. TYPICAL! I am about just to hang up No Smoking signs surreptitiously and then see what happens.
However, smokers will still be allowed to smoke in designated smoking rooms. And those bars not able to provide their guests with a smoking room will be allow smoking in their bars, but there will be a sign with a large "R" on those.

The idiocy... What on earth is so difficult about understanding that if something is dangerous for the person addicted AND others it should not be done in the presence of those it can be harmful for as well? The whole debate is absolutely ridiculous, and there are absolutely no pro-arguments whatsoever on the pro-smoking side.
Most people engaging in the debates did not manage to support their points, and how would they, because there ARE no arguments for it. There are smoking bans in other countries and those are working fine, WHY does it have to be Germany, as always, in which there is a huge, long, wordy debate about everything, in which the most brain dead things are being said in support of a insupportable argument?

It was sooo aggravating to be forced to see so clearly that some of the people in charge of my country have so little in their heads. I cringed at some of those arguments, seriously. They all boiled down to, "Well, it has always been done this way, there is no reason to change it", or to "Well, it is part of a good culture to smoke while drinking wine, it would do damage to our culture if we banned smoking in restaurants", or to "It is a discrimination of addicted people if we exclude them from society!", or even to: "Well, seems as though one of our most reliable institutes had shown us significant evidence supporting the theory that passive smoking indeed does lead to lung cancer, but it could STILL be wrong!"

... but those are MY LUNGS! Ahem. It really started hurting after a while.
mothwing: Image of a death head hawk moth (Default)
"Oh, heeey, I just realised! You know what? People have children in this country! There are people who are under the age of twenty. Hm. Fancy that. People are still having children. Who would have thought! Maybe someone ought to organise something so it's easier for those who do, whaddaya think? Children seem to be a good idea, all in all, yes, I can see it  - mothers, little babies, a proud father - yes, yes..."

That was a few years ago, when the government and the companies in Germany suddenly realised what was obvious to pretty much everybody else. Now, some people in Germany's companies actually have made one step further:

"Ohh, hey, there are not only young people in this country who need looking after, there are also OLD people! Funny how I never made the connection. What with all the talk about Germany's population getting old and all, mh!"

Proof of this cogitation can be found here.
mothwing: (Woman)
Of course there are many cases of men who are vulnerable and in jail, mentally unstable and in jail, not likely to re-offend and in jail, come from a history of abuse and in jail, and who would benefit from mental health care far more than from being in jail. Of course it would be wrong to discriminate people just because of their sex, even though it's positive discrimination this time. Still, abolishing women's jails and replacing them by small secure units sounds like a very good idea.

I've been wondering about the use of women's prisons and it's inmates for ages. There are seven jails for women in Germany, so few that most of the, oh, some 3,000 female offenders are kept in men's prisons instead. And here, like in the UK, most of the "dangerous" criminals in there also seem to be absolutely unlikely to re-offend. Those few who are guilty of crimes that were violent in nearly all cases happened after a long history of abuse, the victim of the female offender usually being the person abusing them. Of course, there are cases of women who are violent and are likely to re-offend - but their numbers are small, only a tenth of the female prisoners. It's the same percentage in the UK.

Most of the female prisoners are suffering from mental health problems in the UK, and I have seen similar articles with the same results for German women. There have been German studies showing that they would benefit from mental health care far better than from incarceration, it's the same in the UK - which makes sense, because why would incarceration be beneficial for mental health?

I really hope they get those reforms under way. And German jails - I wonder why our government, so keen on saving, has not thought about abolishing them already. Even some of our prison wardens in women's jails said that they weren't doing any good and weren't really useful (notably of course the great Helga Einsele).
mothwing: (Woman)
"Marriage under growing threat"

How shocking, look at that:
  • "Curch claims traditional family unit under threat
  • Divorce rates rise 19%
  • Number of children born out of wedlock heads towards 50%"
"Out of wedlock"? Do people really still say that? And also, more importantly: who cares?

When will these people stop, think, and embrace non-traditional families as well?

Some of the happiest families I know are patchwork families that are certainly not traditional while some of the unhappiest families are traditional families with traditionally married people who just never got divorced rather than staying together because of the undying love and a deep spiritual connection.

Of course there ARE happy traditional families as well, and part of me has always thought that those were the lucky ones, the ones who had "gotten things right", but what I and, apparently, these people, fail to realise is that there is no "right" and "wrong" when the happiness of children is concerned, and I am sure you can be as happy or unhappy in a patchwork family or a family with parents who do not have a traditional marriage or relationship as in a traditional family with wife and husband and their two point five (one son, one daughter) ickle little kids and a dog.

This is silly beyond reason. Even if the numbers are going up, even if they're "quickie" divorces, I sincerely doubt that they are ever easy, or that non-traditional families are bad for children or society.

Hamburg and the A380

Saturday, March 3rd, 2007 10:31 am
mothwing: Gif of wolf running towards the right in front of large moon (Wolf)
Article in the Guardian.

Die Zeit: "Das ist wohl das Ende für den A380 als Frachtflugzeug: UPS will ihn nicht mehr - als letzter noch verbliebener Käufer. Die IG Metall kündigte harte Proteste an."

It's not as though there haven't been enough people telling the guys who desperately wanted to build the A380 in my city that there were not enough people interested in purchasing the blasted thing. Now it seems as though the last customer interested in using the plane as a freighter, UPS, has also abandoned the idea of buying the megalomaniac cargo superjumbo. The union said they were going to protest against it.
Of course, it's always bad when jobs are in danger, but in this particular case I find it very, very hard not to be inappropriately gleeful and very cynical about the entire affair. (Sorry, [profile] angie_21_237. Of course I hope that the Resco jobs are safe. :( )

To be able to build that blasted thing, a nature protection area protected both by Hamburg local nature conservation law, federal nature conservation law, EU nature conservation law AND international nature conservation law, the last remaining freshwater tideland in the world, was destroyed.

Without thinking, without questioning, before they even had permission to do so. Before there was word even on how many people were even interested in buying the planes and before the project had even been permitted by various courts and government agencies, they filled in the tideland and started working.

And Hamburg was not even the most ideal location for the construction of that blasted thing in the first place. Before there senate took it into their heads to get this plane to Hamburg instead of Tolouse, where they already have suitable production halls and heck, the necessary airstrip, we had neither. But of course, it is always sensible to build new things in conservation areas than to build things in areas which already have most of the things necessary, and who's interested in a poxy unique natural conservatory, anyway.

Of course, it cost immense amounts of money, they managed to build an airstrip that was TOO FUCKING SHORT and they want to add a couple of kilometres, which would destroy the ONLY fruit-growing areas in Germany not receiving EU sanctions ( well, those were done for before, as curiously, no one is too keen on kerosene on their apples) and hundreds of jobs, they had to relocate a couple of people and they destroyed the only freshwater tideland in the world forever and drove several species into or to the verge of extinction.

Well done, Hamburg senate.

And now, no one even wants to buy the thing, which could have been clear from the beginning because no one had ever professed a tremendous amount of interest in buying the thing FROM THE BEGINNING. There were only a couple of individual interested buyers all over the world who said they might be interested. If that's not mystical economic code language for "Hell, yeah, I want that plane! I hereby place an order for three dozen of the things!!", I really don't see why they went ahead with their plans at all.

Well done.
mothwing: A wanderer standing on a cliff, looking over a distant city (Book)


Nah, Mr Schäuble, there's bound to be no one in the government who thinks that a carte blanche for people who want to snoop around in the most private data of innocent people is not perfectly fine. Of course battling terrorists is more important. Innocent until proven guilty means we are behind in security matters, right?

And with the Federal Office for the Protection of the constitution, seriously! They're the ones who make entries in your criminal record that say something along the lines of "has been investigated by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution" - without ever saying what for and, more importantly, with what result, or for what reason the investigation took place - like the supposed contact with terrorists online.

Yeah, by all means, we really need to change the law that's against that.

Brains?

Klimawandel

Wednesday, February 7th, 2007 01:38 pm
mothwing: Image of a death head hawk moth (Default)
There is an interesting article on climate change and what can be done against it in Die Zeit. Interestingly enough, they mention that "Great Britain is in a climate protection craze".

... uh-hu? Since when?
Must have happened after we left, because while we were still living in Glasgow, we barely needed to put the heating on at all during the coldest months because the warmth coming from the neighbouring flats was enough to keep the flat comfortably warm. Judging from what Colin, the best landlord in the world, told us when we arrived, Glaswegians put on the telly when they come home like a lamp, and the water bills are huge. He was absolutely dumbfounded when we told him and a prospective tenant how much, well, how little we spent on electricity, which was about a quarter of what previous tenants (one of whom had been living ALONE) used to spend. (Our secret: no telly, no unnecessary heating and not leaving the light on in unoccupied rooms. The sheer brilliance of it!)

They did make an effort at the University, but that might have been due to the untiring efforts of the environmental officer on the SRC. They had motion detectors in the library and buildings, and I wish we had those over here (The Humboldt Universität in Berlin did get a little overzealous in their efforts - they put motion detectors in their classrooms, so the light keeps going out when people are not wildly gesticulating while they speak or the professor keeps walking up and down in the room. Hehe).

I hope that what they say is true, though. Glasgow is not exactly environmentally conscious, and it'd be good to hear that that's different in other parts of Britain.

Michael Field

Tuesday, November 28th, 2006 10:32 pm
mothwing: (Woman)

(no subject)

Wednesday, November 22nd, 2006 12:06 pm
mothwing: Image of a death head hawk moth (Default)
"Im Netz selbst gibt es kein soziales Umfeld, keine lokalisierbaren Wertmaßstäbe: Es ist keine lokale Gemeinschaft mit einer gemeinsamen Weltsicht. "

(Die Zeit, 22.11.2006) (On the internet, there is no social environment, no locatable value system: it is not a local community with a shared worldview.)

Au contraire. Technophobic bullshit.

Profile

mothwing: Image of a death head hawk moth (Default)
Mothwing

January 2022

M T W T F S S
     12
345678 9
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Friday, January 2nd, 2026 09:08 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios